Its mostly there in the draft interim report but there are no chapter headings there are no proper references The discussion of the reading you have done is incomplete; you are underselling yourself! The plan for evaluation is not sufficiently explicit
Use the template on the moodle pages
Get a revised version to me asap and we can then send it to Robert.
Once I am away I trust you will maintain the blog. Please email each time you add a post.
We now need the dynamically created version of the checker WITH A DIAGRAM!! I would use circular process diagrams for the dynamically created ones.
How about a better way of creating good and bad urls other than the way you have done it/.
You could have a mechanism whereby the dynamically created processes are run in their own node or as you suggested by having multiple QNM's These may or may not be implemented but if not then they go into future work
Re write the interim report as suggested by both Robert and me!
How are you going to measure scaleability? Add a random time to determine good or bad and always use the same sequence of messages and then vary the number of checkers. and QNM's
Its mostly there in the draft interim report but
ReplyDeletethere are no chapter headings
there are no proper references
The discussion of the reading you have done is incomplete; you are underselling yourself!
The plan for evaluation is not sufficiently explicit
Use the template on the moodle pages
Get a revised version to me asap and we can then send it to Robert.
Once I am away I trust you will maintain the blog. Please email each time you add a post.
The multi process checker version works.
ReplyDeleteWe now need the dynamically created version of the checker WITH A DIAGRAM!!
I would use circular process diagrams for the dynamically created ones.
How about a better way of creating good and bad urls other than the way you have done it/.
You could have a mechanism whereby the dynamically created processes are run in their own node or as you suggested by having multiple QNM's These may or may not be implemented but if not then they go into future work
Re write the interim report as suggested by both Robert and me!
How are you going to measure scaleability? Add a random time to determine good or bad and always use the same sequence of messages and then vary the number of checkers. and QNM's